Chronicon Mirabilium
A historian's look on ancient anomalous celestial phenomena and mysterious history.
Friday, May 14, 2010
Back to 1608 : of festivities and prodigies
Monday, November 16, 2009
Did Alexander the Great really see UFOs ?
It apparently began in 1959 when American writer and broadcaster Frank Edwards wrote the following in his book Stranger than Science :
(Edwards, Frank. Stranger than Science. New York: Lyle Stuart, 1959).
Possibly inspired by Frank Edwards' claim, Alberto Fenoglio wrote in 1966 in the Italian ufological periodical Clypeus :
(Fenoglio, Alberto. "Cronistoria su oggetti volanti del passato - Appunti per una clipeostoria", Clypeus no. 9 (1st semester 1966), p. 7, translated from the Italian and cited by Drake, W.R. Gods and Spacemen in Ancient Greece and Rome. London, 1976, pp. 115-116)
Fenoglio's riddle being, in my opinion, the easiest to solve, I will begin by him. He says that five "flying shields" flew in triangular formation and that, after some time hovering over the walls, a lightning-flash came from the largest of these shields and struck the walls of Tyre. Unfortunately, there is no mention whatsoever of such an event outside of ufological literature. I won't even comment the laughable statement by Fenoglio who dares to say that Johann Gustav Droysen did not mention it on purpose.
(Quintus Curtius Rufus, Historia Alexandri Magni, lib. IV, cap. V)
Immediately after that the sky grew very black and dark, and from the dark sky there came burning fire. The fire fell to the earth like a burning torch, and the whole plain was burning from the fire's flame. Then men said that they thought it was the anger of the gods which had fallen upon us. Then I ordered old clothing to be torn up and used as a protection against the fire. After that we had a quiet and peaceful night, once our difficulties assuaged.
(Orchard, Andy. Pride and Prodigies: Studies in the Monsters of the Beowulf Manuscript, Cambridge, 1995, p. 245)
One might find it amusing however that, in a limited sense, the aforementioned ufo writers have somewhat become the spiritual continuators of the tradition of the Alexander Romance into our century, still adding marvelous events to it, as had done before them their medieval predecessors...
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
1608/1609 : a dragon in Malta - and its relation to the August 1608 apparitions in Genoa
“Chark el Hamien est un abîme profond, situé près la cale de Saint-Georges, et là se trouve un grand réduit d’eau appelé Dragonara, à cause du bruit qui en sort, et que le peuple crédule attribue à un monstre: ce retentissement est occasionné par les évolutions de grosses anguilles qui s’y multiplient à l’infini.” (M. Miège, Histoire de Malte, tome I, Bruxelles, 1841, p. 87).
« Les prodiges qui nous apparoissent sans doute ce sont courriers et postillons célestes, qui nous denoncent les malheurs advenir, et semble qu’ils nous provoquent de courir aux remedes des prieres et aux jeusnes à celle fin d’appaiser l’ire de ce grand Dieu, lequel nous offençons journellement. Les Romains aussi tost qu’ils appercevaient des prodiges ils faisoient sacrifice aux Dieux pour appaiser leurs coleres par victimes et idolatrie. Et nous qui sommes Chrestiens nourris en une meilleure escole il faut que saintement nous presentions nos cœurs contriz, et repentans et humblement prier le Tout Puissant de nous pardonner nos fautes, et vouloir appaiser sa juste colere a celle fin que les malheurs qui nous sont preparez par la justice soyent destournez et chassez loing de nous par sa saincre misericorde. » (1608 Genoa).
« Les prodiges & miracles que nous appercevons journellement, ce sont postillons de ce grand Dieu, qui nous denonce par ces avant-courriers ce qu’il nous donne à l’advenir : Mais pour appaiser l’ire de ce Tout-puissant, il faut que nous nous mettions en bon estat, pour jeusner, & le prier d’un cœur penitent, à celle fin que par nos devotes prieres il detourne de nous l’influence de ses flots & autres dards calamiteux. Au temps passé les Payens faisoient sacrifice aux Dieux lors qu’ils appercevoient des prodiges. Et nous qui sommes Chrestiens nourris en une meilleure escole, devons nous presenter à ce grand Dieu, & l’invoquer souvent avec prieres lamentables, d’un cœur contrit & humilié, pour impetrer sa grace, à celle fin qu’il nous delivre de ces tribulations qui nous preparez par sa justice. » (1609 Malta).
Thursday, April 2, 2009
1527 : Celestial phenomenon
Pictorial depictions of celestial phenomena were not unusual for that time frame, we know of many which were printed along with the massive popular broadsides or in more luxurious books such as, among others, Lycosthenes' Prodigiorum ac Ostentorum (1557), or Cornelius Gemma's De naturae divinis characterismis (1575). These printed depictions however were often of poor quality and reproduced from rough woodcuts.
What really stands out with the present document is not only the fact that it is original, but more importantly hand-painted, and in colors.
The watermark on the paper, representing a beetle on a small shield, was used to determine the approximative date of execution of the painting (circa 1550) and offers a hint as to the identity of the anonymous painter (Swabia, Bavaria, possibly Augsburg).
We can thus determine that the painting was not executed immediately after the event but about 25 years later. The existence of another painting (probably by the same anonymous hand), similar in execution and depicting a monstrous birth in 1513 (held by the Staatsgalerie in Stuttgart, inv. no. C 92/4097) hints toward the idea that the present painting was part of a series or album of prodigious phenomena of which only two sheets, including this one, are known today.
Various 16th century authors have mentioned a particularly spectacular celestial phenomenon in 1527 clearly visible over western Germany. Most of them talk of a "comet" but do not agree on the month: some place its appearance on August 11, others on October or December 11. All of them, except Abraham Rockenbach in his De cometis... (1598, 1602), say that the phenomenon appeared only once and lasted for less than two hours. Rockenbach however says that it was visible for many days, an hour and a half each day. Being a later account, general consensus has always considered Rockenbach as mistaken.
The only contemporary source is a small 16-page booklet written by Peter Creutzer, pupil of astrologer Johann Lichtenberger, and printed the same year (Auslegung Peter Creutzers, etwan des weytberhümbten Astrologi M. Jo. Liechtenbegers [sic] discipels über den erschrecklichen Cometen... erschynen am xi. tag Weynmonats des MCCCCCxxvii. Jars ..., n.d. [1527], n.p.). The booklet was reprinted many times in German and even translated into Latin by Gerhard Geldenhauer/Noviomagus (De terrificio cometa, cui a condito orge similis visus non est, qui apparuit anno M.D.XXVII. mense Octobri... , 1527) and in French the following year (La terrible et espoventable comete laquelle apparut le XI. Doctobre lan M.CCCCC.XXVII. en Westrie region Dalemaigne..., n.d. [1528], n.p. - Seguin no. 226 & 227).
Creutzer's text is the basis from which all other later accounts derived, and among them, the handwritten text which accompanies the present hand-painting. The latter reads as such:
Creutzer's booklet contains on its front-page a woodcut image illustrating his most pictorial description of the phenomenon [see ill.]. This illustration has become quite famous, and found its way in Lycosthenes' Prodigiorum ac Ostentorum... (1557), Boaistuau's Histoires prodigieuses... (1560), Ambroise Paré's Des monstres... (1573, 1585), Cornelius Gemma's De naturae divinis... (1575), and all the way to Camille Flammarion in the 19th century.
Even though the phenomenon has been labeled as a comet ever since its description by Creutzer, many scholars today tend to consider it as an auroral display, mostly because of its highly picturesque description and depiction (spears, figures, blood, etc.).
The present painting offers a different view of the event. While there are no firm elements to support the idea that the painting was based on anything else than Creutzer's original description, its representation clearly differs from the other sources known to this day, in that it is closer to the representation of a comet-like phenomenon than that of an auroral display.
We have seen earlier that all sources, except A. Rockenbach, have described the phenomenon as of single and short duration, which is mostly the basis, along with the pictorial description, of its identification as an aurora borealis. Close examination of these sources however have shown that they all used the same single source, namely Creutzer's booklet, which is also betrayed by the evident reuse of the same illustration (with very minor modifications) over time.
With the discovery of this new and exceptional document, it is now possible to ponder whether the identification as an aurora should still stand and whether more consideration should be given to Abraham Rockenbach's account which describes a longer-term phenomenon, and therefore hinting toward a more "comet-like" phenomenon.
Saturday, March 7, 2009
UFOs in the past ? About two fakes spreading around the Internet....
We shall here examine two of these illustrations which are unfortunately very widespread all over the network.
The first of them is supposed to illustrate the apparition of a UFO during the siege of the castle of "Sigisburg" (in fact Syburg) by an army of Saxons in 776 A.D. Most of the sites attribute this illustration to "a 12th century manuscript, the Annales Laurissenses, written by a monk named Laurence" :
This is not a completely wrong claim, if we except the monk Laurence part which is the result of a misunderstanding of the name of the Annals and the date which is the date of the manuscript we know them from but not of the Annals themselves (Annals were often continued over multiple centuries by multiple authors: the Annales Laurissenses which are part of the Royal Frankish Annals, Annales Regni Francorum, extends from 741 to 829).
The Annales Laurissenses indeed contain an entry for the year 776 which reads as such:
[776] [...] and the same day, while they [the Saxons] were preparing for another assault against the Christians who were living in the castle, the glory of God manifested itself above the church inside the fortress. Those who were watching in the square outside - many of which still live today - said that they saw something resembling two large flaming shields of reddish color moving above the church itself. [...] (Annales Laurissenses Maiores, in MGH SRG 6, p. 44).So the fact that a celestial phenomenon happened in 776 A.D. during the siege of the castle of Syburg is well established by the Annales Laurissenses. Now, what about the illustrations which we can find all over the internet? Can these possibly be some miniatures from a 12th century copy of the Annals as the sites claim?
It doesn't take a medievalist to see that the illustrations are too crude to be medieval miniatures. Their style does not match 12th century ones and they don't even look like book miniatures, more like color-sprayed frescoes. This is already highly suspicious but let's pretend they are genuine and do some research on the indications the web sites have given us.
The oldest manuscript known today which contains a copy of the Annales Laurissenses is known as the Lorsch Codex. This is where the Annales Laurissenses took their name, monasterium Laureshamense being the Latin name of the Lorsch monastery. The Lorsch Codex is indeed dated from the 12th century and is most probably the one referred to when talking about the provenance of the above illustrations. A fac-simile of the manuscript has been published by Karl Glöckner in between the years 1929-1936. The 1963 reprint of this fac-simile has recently been put online on the ALO site.
Unfortunately, even if the Lorsch Codex does contain some miniatures for initials, it does not contain our beautiful world-wide-web illustrations. These must have come from elsewhere.
Hopefully, I was given the solution to my perplexity by Daniel Guenther, fellow researcher in the field, who pointed the following 13th century Spanish fresco to me. The fresco depicts the journey of the three magi on their way to Bethleem:
As we can see, the comparison speaks for itself as both illustrations are very similar. Except of course for the star of Bethleem which has been facetiously replaced by a most representative spacecraft from outer space. As a result, this illustration should now be dismissed as a modern fake. My plea in this direction to the web sites propagating the image have still remained unanswered. This kind of sites like to claim that "the horrible truth disturbs the establishment". Well, in that case at least, the truth apparently disturbs them...
But let's move on to our second illustration. This one has been labeled "842 Angers" by an unknown Photoshopic hand and is supposed, as the label says, to illustrate the apparition of a celestial phenomenon over the city of Angers in 842 A.D. At least that's how most web sites present it :
As for the Syburg image, a quick look at the illustration already brings some suspicion about its supposed date. This one looks evidently more genuine but is more than reminiscent of the woodcut illustrations that were printed in 16th and 17th century leaflets, especially the ones printed in Germany. A rapid check in this direction allowed me to find the following document which I invite you to compare with the one above :
With the exception of the coloration, both illustrations are absolutely identical, except that the one above depicts the apparition of a comet over the city of Nuremberg in October 1580 and has no relation whatsoever with Angers nor with a mid-9th century date.
The German leaflet which was printed in Nuremberg by Hans Mack is well referenced and copies of it are held by two German libraries, one in Nuremberg (GM. 2806/1204) and one in Berlin (D-4 14-8).
As most similar leaflets it is known and referred to by its title: Erinnerung und Warnung / von dem jetzt scheinenden Cometen / so im disem Monat Octobris / dess jetzt lauffenden 80. Jars / erstmals erschienen. For some unknown reason, this document, which is an interesting piece in itself, has been reused and falsely relocated in terms of time and place from Nuremberg 1580 to Angers 842.
Apart from showing how erroneous information can easily spread on the internet, these two cases illustrate the fact that many self-proclaimed researchers and proponents of the idea of UFO visitation in the past do not make the necessary verifications to the documents they use. And that's without even speaking about competences in the historical field...
Sunday, March 1, 2009
The (extraordinary) origins of Joan of Arc according to Béroalde de Verville (1599)
I won’t go here into the detail of these controversial propositions which would be a subject of its own but suffice it to say that the fact that later authors and biographers often added extraordinary and fabulous events for dramatic purposes has in some cases contributed to blur the line between historical events and romance.
The present text follows a common classical tradition which consisted of remodeling the origins of high-stature or heroic individuals to add to their prestige. In this work, which is chronologically the first romance based on the story of Joan of Arc, the author, François-Béroalde de Verville (1556-1626) transposes the latter’s place of birth from the modest town of Domrémy to a remote utopia, the land of Sympsiquée, where Joan is born of the love of a French knight, Borandor, with the nymph Armeliane.
The land of Sympsiquée is an almost inaccessible island which can be found only by mariners of high virtue. The author locates it in the Persian Gulf and it is home to a utopian kingdom founded by a Greek prince, Heracleon. The latter possessed a golden book which contains among other cabalistic secrets, the destiny of Joan which is read to her when she reaches the age of fifteen. The revelation of the golden book teaches her of the necessity to travel to France in a mysterious flying ship built by Heracleon himself. Leaving with regrets the fabulous land of Sympsiquée, and accompanied by a few nymphs, Joan boards the celestial galley (“galère céleste”), travels over the seas and lands, and finally descend in a remote woody place of the Ardennes where she and her nymph companions use the flying ship as their home.
The rest of the story, while not less romanesque, is of less interest to our subject so I’ll not detail it here. Needless to say, everything related above is pure fiction from de Verville’s part, in a style not unfamiliar to the “roman chevaleresque”.
Source :François-Béroalde de Verville. La Pucelle d’Orléans restituée par Béroalde de Verville. Paris, chez Mathieu Guillemot, 1599.
Discours XI
Il y avoit longtemps qu’estranger aucun n’estoit venu en l’Isle Sympsiquée & mesmes de Françoys, qui fust occasion que Borandor fut reçeu de meilleur œil, & que la Royne des Nymfes eut pour aggreable de prendre la charge de tout ce qui luy estoit necessaire. Or y avoit-il un statut en l’Isle escrit en une lame d’Or sur la porte du Chasteau, par lequel il estoit permis aux estrangers d’estre seulement un moys en l’Isle, & s’ils estoyent Françoys ils y pouvoyent estre quarante deux jours, lesquels expirez il falloit qu’ils rentrassent en leur vaisseau, ou qu’ils rentrassent en leur vaisseau, ou qu’ils demandassent congé de demeurer plus longtemps en l’Isle.
[Borandor tombe amoureux d’Armeliane, reine des Nymphes, ce qui lui permet de rester dans l’île. De leurs amours, nait Jeanne, futur Jeanne d’Arc.]
[…] Belles Dames encor faut-il que vous sçachiez un secret que vous trouverez estrange, non pource qu’il le soit, mais d’autant qu’il n’est gueres connu au commun, c’est que les enfans qui naissent en Sympsiquée, ont une particularité remarquable ; vous sçaurez les autres merveilles apres celles cy, si Dieu nous fait la grace de vous conduire de l’œil jusques en ce lieu de miracles naturels & artificiels : Les enfans venans à voir la clarté suyvent mesme ordre que les autres, & la difference n’aparoist qu’au septiesme mois, qu’il semble que la mort vueille generalement enlever ce que nature a produit, car on void les petits enfans comme deffaillir & devenir pasles, plus resemblans images de la mort, que creatures vivantes, les signes du trespas se collent sur leurs visages, & s’imprimans sur tout le corps le tient en ce piteux spectacle l’espace de cinq jours, apres lesquels on void une solution de continuité se faire generalle en la peau qui se fent comme la pellicule de l’amende qui est desechée, ainsi se faict une separation, & ce cuir mort tombe & sort de la dedans un enfant plus beau, plus parfaict & plus aggreable qu’au paravant. […] Notre belle Pucelle nasquit comme les autres enfans de Sympsiquée, & son pere voulut qu’elle eut nom Janne, pour ce que ses predecesseurs avoyent esté avancez par le Roy Jean leur Moecene duquel jamais la mémoire ne s’effacea de son cœur. […]
[Jeanne a grandi et est en âge d’accomplir son destin.]>
Discours XIII
[…] Tout enfant d’estranger reçeu, estant venu en aage doit aller au pays de son Père & y demeurer tant que par quelque acte genereux se soit fait paroistre, & ne retourner sans emporter la gloire d’un fait notable & vertueux. Par cette Saincte Loy, la Pucelle se sçachant obligée, & desirant en humilité obeyr à ceux qui avoyent puissance sur ces volontez & entrer en ce quelle devoit, voulut paroistre qu’elle sentoit bien son cœur & se monstreroit digne surjon de la famille des Areores […] Il fut advisé qu’il estoit temps de l’envoyer en France, & mit on ordre à ce qui faisoit besoin pour si beau voyage. Artalonde grande ayeule d’Armeliane ayant herité des memoires d’Heracleon (lesquels estoient conservez fort soigneusement, congnoissant par leur moyen ce qui se peut sçavoir des meilleurs & plus utiles secrets de l’art & de la nature) avoit autresfois inventé une galere Celeste dont l’industrie estoit non seulement admirable & magnifique, mais d’un usage de grand profit & commodité, par l’ayde de cette galere on pouvoit s’eslever sur l’espors des aers plus solides au haut ainsi que sur les mers, & maniant un timon qui faisoit mouvoir les organes on se conduisoit à plaisir, & le vaisseau se balançeant en ses proportions suyvoit la route que le vent luy donnoit par l’adresse de la conduite & du mouvement : Armeliane avoit bien conservé ce vaisseau, lequel elle donna à sa fille honneste compangnie pour la servir & assister, ordonnant son equipage tel que son rang & maison le requeroit : Elle luy bailla deux Demoyselles & deux servantes, un Escuyer & deux vallets, la plus ancienne des Demoyselles estoit Aldonze la Sage, qui avoit apris ainsi que les Areores à guider la galere, l’autre estoit Colizerpe la Belle qui avoit tant diligemment consideré ce qu’il falloit sçavoir pour la Cyrurgie, qu’elle estoit tres-experte comme en plusieurs autres sciences. […] La Belle delice qui est à l’instant de son partement & qui veut la bonne volonté de ses parens terriens, avoir la faveur du Pere Tout puissant, tombée és plus sainctes humilitez de devotion, va en ce lieu d’adoration pour invoquer la grace souveraine : Elle y entre accompagnée de la troupe devotte qui se trouvant au lieu sacré durant les Saints mysteres se contient en une Religieuse observation qui tesmoigne le zelle des ames fidelles. […]
La Pucelle tascha selon son humilité ordinaire de satisfaire à tous & laissant un vif regret dans les cœurs se mit en estat d’entrer en son vaisseau pour desloger. En cette despartie que larmes s’escouloyent de tous costez, que les beautez disant adieu se deguisoyent en infinies figures selon les opinions du regret qui se formoit en l’ame […] la Pucelle entrée dans sa Galere se donne route selon que l’intention se preparoit, ores sur le plain des mers & ores par le vague des airs, tant que relevée plus haut sur les Gaules elles esleut lieu propre à sa descente, pour s’accoustumer à nouveau pays, & chercher occasion de bien faire. Le vaisseau sagement conduit vint se rendre dans les Ardennes prez les limites de la Lorraine, en un endroit assez couvert & ou il sembloit que la fortune eut preparé le logis de la Pucelle, les arbres y estoyent droits & en quelques lieux s’espoissisans faisoyent un desirable ombrage, cette arrivée de bien futur à la France fut environ le mois de Mars. La Pucelle & ces gens se trouvans comme en lieu de conqueste loin de toute societé, ne laisserent de se bien accommoder faisant de leur galere ainsi que d’une belle & honneste petite maison, autour laquelle ils preparent l’endroit d’un jardin & firent la loge de leurs petits chiens, çelà ainsi preparé la Pucelle establissant une nouvelle vie y suyvit la mesme qu’elle pratiquoit en son Isle, attendant que la fortune luy presenta quelque occasion de s’avançer, ou qu’elle l’alla chercher. Ainsi se retirant en son petit racourcy de Palais, s’y venoit reposer aprez qu’elle avoit esté à la chasse au travers les buissons, & divers endroits des bois qu’elle alloit traversant selon que ses plaisirs la menoyent, son habit de chasse la rendoit presque semblable à la Deesse des forests que l’on void courant au travers des boys ou ses Nimfes l’accompagnent. […]
Thursday, February 12, 2009
KRAKEN, a new Cryptozoology journal
Subtitled "Archives of Cryptozoology", KRAKEN will regularly publish original studies on a particular cryptozoological dossier and other studies dedicated to the epistemology and history of this domain, as well as to the numerous and rich controversies which have risen along its evolution.
In the first issue, the reader will find the transcription of a debate between Bernard Heuvelmans and a group of academics and researchers specialized in UFO studies. In this little-known document which was printed in very small numbers in 1981, the "father of Cryptozoology" discusses questions of method. This text is commented by Pierre Lagrange, editor of KRAKEN.
The editors' wish is to launch a rigorous reflection on the themes pertaining to this domain of research. Since the disappearance of the Journal of the ISC, Cryptozoology and the newsletter which was published by this organization, the study of hidden animals seems to have lost some ground. The editors of KRAKEN believe this is mostly due to the lack of place of publication and exchange.
Département de Cryptozoologie B. Heuvelmans,
Musée cantonal de Zoologie,
Place de la Riponne, 6
CH-1014, Lausanne
Switzerland
More info here.